Enemies of Liberty are ruthless. To own your Liberty, you'd better come harder than your enemies..

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Flawed thinking...


Have we for so long been told that violence is not the answer to everything, that we have come to believe violence is not the answer for anything?

Here are two simple questions for you: Is the man or woman who votes for any modern D (or R for that matter) living a life of Rightful Liberty?

Next question: Does living a life of Rightful Liberty demand that you leave that D (or R) voter alone, since they are free to vote for whoever they wish?

If you answered "yes" to either of those questions, then I must ask you a final question: Are you flippin' brain damaged?!

If you are not brain damaged, or batshit crazy, then your thinking is dangerous to Liberty.

For those of you already getting worked up and puffy-faced, pause for a moment and think.

There is not a modern D or R who runs against Entitlements, who runs for the elimination of direct taxation, who runs on a platform of repealing all anti-2A laws, or who runs to eliminate DHS, who runs for genuine Constitutional restraint.

That means, dear Patriot, that every single person who votes for any of those politicians, is casting a vote to empower those politicians to violate your Rightful Liberty with the force of arms.  How can you possibly not hold the voter responsible for the gun in your face when you choose to ignore their tyranny?

The differences between what is being done to Americans today is different from Mao and Stalin only in degrees of color, not substance.  I am being robbed every single day by my fellow Countrymen, to feed other Countrymen, at the expense of my own family.  And every single day those people strive and work to take more from me to realize their own agenda.

You support their "Right" to vote for politicians who promise to continue stealing from me?  Fuck you.

Once a man or woman has demonstrated an intent to deny my Rightful Liberty, he is an Enemy to the premise of Liberty and a personal enemy in my life.  The moment that person takes an active step toward imposing his will upon me, thus violating my Rightful Liberty, he or she is a valid target as a tyrant by proxy.

If one million people stand ready to strip me of my property, that means one million people are wrong, and one million people are worthy of my unrestrained self-defense.  In this country I have hundreds of millions who stand against my right to keep my own money - does that make them right?  Does their sheer number mean I must comply?  Or, am I morally entitled to put every honkin' one of them in a ditch?

In case you are wondering, the ditch wins, every time.

You don't like my position?  Fuck you again.

Kerodin
III

13 comments:

  1. Thank you for this. This is exactly what needs to be said.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A lot of folks can be educated, however. Those with the minds to learn and grow beyond their paradigm are key.

    There's plenty of folks that voted for tyranny. Such as most of the folks that voted the straight D/R ticket. But quite a few did so out of ignorance. Some can be shown why such a thing is wrong. It's never too late for someone to 'come around' to Rightful Liberty. Heck these poor folks have been typically indoctrinated since birth. A lot of them have not had the benefits some of us had.

    I had the privileged of growing up 'awake' for the most part, thanks to my father. I never had the layer upon layer of paradigms to shed like most folks apparently do. I knew it was BS from day one, because that's what I was taught and how I was brought up for the most part.

    I remember reading history in 2nd grade and correcting the teacher on what was BS and what was not. (They didn't like that very much...) ;)

    So whilst I don't support the folks who ignorantly vote for tyranny and more bread and circuses, I do comprehend the why behind it all.

    It doesn't make it RIGHT, mind ye, and I'm not making excuses for them. But it does make it understandable. And thus, gives us a way to fix some of it. They're just ignorant. If we can make them NON-ignorant, then it's a win-win for us, and we don't have to ditch the poor fecks.

    I think that a lot of folks can be steered in the right direction. And I think a lot of us are doing that, a little at a time. Will it be enough people, soon enough? Heck if I know. But at least it's progress. Which is preferable to stagnation and/or more slippery slope done slipped 'o tyranny. It's also one more human on OUR team vs being on team tyranny or ditched because they became a de facto enemy due to their idiotic choices.

    It's folks who refuse to ever believe they are wrong about anything that are a danger, or non-salvageable.

    Heck, I have no doubt I'm wrong about a few things every now and again. But then again I'm not married to a paradigm. I weigh new information as I come across it and adjust my view as necessary. If anyone ever feels I'm wrong about something, all they have to do is say so, and point out why, and I'll re-evaluate if necessary. I'm not some unapproachable hard-arse with a fixed viewpoint irrelevant of what information comes my way.

    I imagine other folks may be similar, in mindset.

    Folk openly advocating trading one form of tyranny for another, are a whole separate ball of wax. I have no tolerance for those folks, and they'll get their comeuppance that is rightly owed to them in the due course of time.

    But folks are waking up a bit more each day. This Secession hubbub is encouraging. Not because I think they'll do anything here in round one, but because at least it's getting folks THINKING, which is a step up from the prior status of watching mold grow. :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. I constantly pound this theme into my 12 year old daughter's head! Taxation at the point of a gun is tyranny! The amount of re-education required is staggering, but........a few thru the guillotine will do wonders for the learning curve of the masses

    ReplyDelete
  4. You been reading my blog too much, heh heh heh. Took the words right out of my mouth!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sharp stuff; I think it's basically right. I'd go so far as to say it's downright foolish to take any other approach, even as I admittedly allow for plenty of idiocy among my neighbors, such that what they're doing doesn't really rise to the level of "informed intent." Though as you imply, it's still the rotten deed anyway.

    That's not the problem; the problem is you're running into that damn contradiction again. You've got the reality of it correct in this post, but you also want "Rule of Law" simultaneously, which means that their POV is indeed "legitimate" by TPTB and their "legal interpretations." Let's not forget that all State massacres are legal, and have been forever.

    You'll retort, "But that's against the Constitution" or, "But we're gonna restore Constitutional principles back in this country." First of all you're not gonna do that, but more interesting is whether you'd really want to. What you really want is the RECOGNITION of the principles, and people to ABIDE that recognition.

    That's right, isn't it? That's what you want, yes? So as I was saying in the other post, the wise tack is to treat things as they are, including what you want. You don't really want either the Constitution or the Rule of Law necessarily; you want people to behave as they would under such reasonable principles and the ensuing statutes.

    Well, that's the secret---you don't need the statutes for that. You only need people to (choose to) behave as the (principled) statutes would have them behave...which basically means they can do whatever the hell they want, as long as they don't forcefully inhibit other people from doing whatever the hell they want.

    And if they don't? Well, as you so clearly express here, you don't really need the statutes to deal with that either, do you?

    Plus, then you don't have the problem of how to enforce the Law against (monopoly) enforcers of the Law who don't follow the Law. Currently, that seems to be the biggest problem, yes?

    Sorry if I'm frustrating you; just trying to move forward, that's all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Nations and peoples who forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms."

    and...

    “War is not violence and killing, pure and simple; war is controlled violence, for a purpose. The purpose of war is to support your government's decisions by force. The purpose is never to kill the enemy just to be killing him . . . but to make him do what you want him to do. Not killing . . . but controlled and purposeful violence.” - Robert A. Heinlein

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now I basically said the same thing on my (now defunct) blog and was called an asshole 30 different ways. Reamember my last post and the one the day after the election?
    I like your readers better than I did mine.
    I just had a hard time understanding how anybody can have a dream and then go down and cast a ballet for somebody, anybody that is going to trample it. I am completely unapolgetic about this: If you have anything to do with the violation of any of my Rights, you are my enemy.
    Deguello!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Can you rule yourself? Do you have core principle that assume everyone may live their life as they wish as long as they do not hurt others? You rights end at my property line unless I'm unsafe and put others at risk. Your rights end at my personal space. I don't care about your property values. I take care of my property because it adds value to my own home but where does a HOA get off deciding the paint color you can paint a home?
    God gave me this life, not the government and I'm an easy going person and as long as a person is safe(not putting another at risk for vermin or disease) paint the house purple!
    The ends do not justify the means. If you think lying, theft, prevication is okay to create your vision of Utopia. Go stand on the ash heap of history along with the Fabian socialists,progressives, Mao, Stalin, Hitler and the rest of the despots of all ilks.
    My life is my own to live the best I can and belongs to no one but me, not even God owns it. He gave me the gift of life and set me free to live it as I wish. He gave me good rules to live by and has helped me quite a lot but it is my life to win or lose as I see fit and no one else has the right to say how I live this life if I do not infringe on others lives.

    ReplyDelete
  9. None of us are living rightful liberty today. How did you feel waking up 11-7-2012 knowing you now lived in a totalitarian, marxist, socialist country.

    Intent to deny liberty? "Rightful Liberty"? Ha ha, it is not liberty they wish to subvert. It is You. Wear your dunce hat with pride in front of your countrymen. For most have been fooled and shamed. It is now, in our current age, that once again. Once again "WE" must, however painful use what we abhor to define "Rightful Liberty"

    They hate competition. In any form they hate opposition. The gallows pole has it's favor among the righteous, and it's means for the Tyrant. Violence has proven its effectiveness.

    You do a good work. "WE" appreciate you....

    DragrIII

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kinda like I heard awhile back:"violence is rarely the answer, but when it is,its the ONLY answer!
    Or my personal favorite ....half-steppin will get ya killed

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree that voting is an act of violence. When you vote, you are asking the government to do what you are two cowardly to do yourself. If you think you have the right to "demand" my property to eat, then come to my house and take the food off of my table. If you are a woman who says I need to pay for your birth control, come to my church and demand we pass a plate for to support your sexual activities. But you will not. You authorized the government to do this to me, for your benefit.

    Now if they cared about the Liberty (which they do not) they would remind us, that we voted for this. We all voted for the 16th Amendment. It was introduced by Republicans and 3/4 of the House both Democrats and Republicans voted for it. It was signed by the President, it was passed by 3/4 of the States (although there is some controversy about four states). We voted to give the government the right to seize our property for the benefit of others.

    Thus they could say, "...this is a republic, and we voted, and we won, pay up." We must have answers for this.

    I go over this here: http://charlescarrollsociety.com/2012/11/16/reflections-on-post-election-america-and-whats-next-a-response/

    And here is a good history of the Socialist Amendment: http://www.latterdayconservative.com/articles/history-of-the-16th-amendment/

    The Bard.

    ReplyDelete
  12. So ditch all that cant see the lie, all that did not see the lie, but now do and all that will see the lie as time gose on. To me that would make the III% about .000001%.

    IS it not one persons Rightful Liberty to cast a vote for what they believe in, even if that belief is based on a lie? If not then I say you hit the nail on the head.

    the true enemy are those that knowingly promote and support the lie for thier benafit and those that knowingly stand idle letting the lie continue.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Good food for thought here, I hope folks are taking notes. You will come to need them.

    ReplyDelete

Please post anonymously. III Society members, please use your Call Sign.