Enemies of Liberty are ruthless. To own your Liberty, you'd better come harder than your enemies..

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Moral High Ground: Who holds it, right now...


The polls in the right column offer interesting insights to the people who choose to come here and read.  One of the greatest assets of traveling and sharing CQB skills with Patriots over the summer was the ability to meet in person, take the measure of one another, build trust, cohesion and morale.  As a result of our face-to-face discussions, I knew how the polls at right would be answered.  I know where most of you stand, how ready you are to join John Parker on the Green, and in some cases, who is ready to be John Parker.

Something else I know about some of the folks who come here, folks who generally seek the same outcome as do I (Liberty) - some of you wish I would shut down the blog, or at least change my tone or rhetoric.  I also know some have discussed making that happen, with or without my cooperation.  I also know I have some allies who would show up at the X spot on the map if I asked for help, and they'd be loaded for bear.

Here is something I'd like to ask:  Do you think Patriots have the moral right to resort to proactive violence, right now, given the behaviors of the Enemies of Liberty, if they decided to do so?

I'm not calling for action.  This is a discussion, only.  I'm not asking any "...what if..." questions.  I am not even going to identify targets, other than to say thou shall not murder (quite different than thou shall not kill) and no malum in se is permissible, even in this rhetorical.  I am not asking what your trigger or tripwire would be.

Simply stated: Have the Enemies of Liberty already crossed the line so far that Patriots would be on the proper side of morality if they started hunting today...

93% of you who answered the poll said that the Rule of Law is dead...

96% of you said it is time to respond in kind...

Most of you recognize the stupidity and emptiness of the "No Fort Sumter" rule, given that the Enemies of Liberty violate that standard every single day of the week.

If a Patriot, or a Team of Patriots, went to the Green tonight, would you agree that they hold the Moral High Ground?

The poll is at right.  Yes, I think I know how most of you will answer - because many of us have met, and talked, and sworn Lives, Fortunes, and Sacred Honor.

Please take a second and answer the poll, and let your fellow Patriots know where you stand.

Kerodin
III

11 comments:

  1. "93% of you who answered the poll said that the Rule of Law is dead..."

    Wow. Where do the other 7% live?


    "96% of you said it is time to respond in kind..."

    Check my math on this. If 97% do wrong and 96% of the remaining 3% believe the proper response is to act "in kind," that leaves 1.2% who neither want to do wrong, nor respond by doing wrong.

    I think that still leaves about 4 million people. Y'all can come over to my place and we'll see if we can defend ourselves against this madness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aw, it's only .12% or 400K. I guess that makes for an easier perimeter.

      I like it, Victor..."Self-defense is self-defense." If our imagination of self-defense were self-defense, the commie-libs might be right. But they aren't.

      Delete
  2. We had the moral high ground when Bush signed the "Patriot Act" which was a slap in every American's face

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuckin~A right, and we've exhibited the patience of Saints. Grab your balls in both hands, because failure is not an option, THE STAKES ARE OUR LIVES!
      III
      Resist
      VICTOR

      Delete
  3. Up here in Northern MI the folks mostly are in the mindset of F the gubbermint(even tho many are on the dole)so the political support does exist. But I honestly don't see the needed # of "fighters"-yet. That will change with time and competent leaders. When Big G harms the wrong(or right) person it will most likely spark physical action. The fields certainly grow ripe.

    NDV III

    ReplyDelete
  4. I voted yes but, there is always a "but" isn't there, the media is the problem. As in any action will be portrayed as wackos, nut jobs terrorist right wing extremist. The lose of 111 lives would be in vain and the message stamped out. The victims would be honored and praised. Beed to have a way to counter the media lies, either before or after. Just my nickel's worth.

    Lynn A. Stokes aka Loco Gato
    Morro Bay,Ca.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Do not change your tone.
    Hypothetically... proactive kinetics, done small scale and intelligently, fucking A right now.
    Self defense is self defense, more citizens are coming around each day, we need to win their support before we go big, and right now the administration is doing that for us.
    John Q. Public would recoil from obvious proactive violence at this point. The way so many have been turned against the gun, most still view us as terrorists as it is (brainwashed).
    But, bladed wet work? We're behind the 8 ball already.

    III
    Resist
    VICTOR

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm done... done bitting my tongue, done suppressing my rage.

    It's a shame they are mostly atheists. Because god fucking help them if I get them before they get me.

    No malum en se.
    Nor will I expect mercy, where none has been given.

    I have been pushed beyond my boundry, next I will cross my Rubicon, on my time line at my choice of crossing.

    III
    Resist

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some people would prefer you shut down your blog? fuck that.

    Actually, the 1A is kinda an illusion now, but keep going anyway, fuck it.

    I don't have a lot to contribute to the Citadel, but if you asked me for help at spot x I would find a way to get there.

    As for your question about the Green, the answer is yes.


    ReplyDelete
  8. Just bought property in the Redoubt, and moving my whole business operation there in the next six months.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The media, so called conservatives..."Don't react, that's just what they want, then they will enact martial law" Really? So define martial law, is it not the employment of D.H.S.? What is the definition of a thin red line?
    At some point principles will become resistant to tyranny and action will be abundant .

    ReplyDelete

Please post anonymously and include your recognized online handle in the body of the comment.